Abraham lincoln vampire hunter review-roundup

Tim Burton's Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is finally here! After months of speculation, we can finally experience Burton's latest effort on the big screen! But how good is the movie, according to the critics? Check out our review round-up below for the answer to that question, and be sure to leave your opinion in the comments!

Overall, the critics have been generally negative about the movie, but moviegoers seem to love it!? So far, it has a Rotten Tomatoes critic score of 39% (Rotten), but a user score of 75% (Fresh). Quite a spread! Similarly, though not dramatic, Metacritic currently shows a critic score of 40/100 (Mixed or average reviews) with a user rating of 6.3/10 (Generally favorable). Here's what some of the critics have to say:

Loved It


Score: 4/5
It's crazier than an antebellum bedbug, but Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter is one of Summer 2012's definite sleepers.

Read more:

Score: B+
The summer's most fantastic guilty pleasure.

Read more:

Mr. Movie

Score: 3.5/5
The upside: the vampires really suck and the movie doesn't.

Read more:

Bekmambetov... stages hilarious, imaginative, almost free-form action sequences like nobody in the business.

Read more:

Star-Democrat (Easton, MD)

Score: B
A clever, elegantly made melding of fact and fiction.

Read more:

San Francisco Chronicle

Score: 3/4
Walker is a tall, lean guy with a big hat who can swing an ax. What else can be said?

Read more:

Thought it was just "okay"

Entertainment Weekly

Score: 58/100
With so much flesh crunching and bloodletting, it could have been scary as all Walking Dead get-out. Instead, the movie plays safe by cutting every theme down the middle - a swing that's effective when splitting wood or vampire skulls, but dull when applied to filmmaking.

Read more:,,20587984,00.html

Time Magazine (Entertainment)

Score: 40/100
Watching this is like flipping channels randomly between a Masterpiece Theatre drama and a splatter film on Cinemax. If you're like me, you'll stick with the splatter.

Read more:

Score: C
Bekmambetov doesn't expect us to take the premise seriously, exactly. But he doesn't seem to want us to laugh at it, either.

Read more:

USA Today

Score: 2.5/4
Despite its factual dismemberment of the movie's namesake, Hunter bristles as summer action fodder. Honest.

Read more:

New York Times

Score: 2/5
"Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" is such a smashing title it's too bad someone had to spoil things by making a movie to go with it.

Read more:

Los Angeles Times

Score: 2/4
Given the subject matter, an exercise in delicacy and restraint was unlikely, but it's too bad that the film's concept is way more entertaining than what has ended up on-screen.

Read more:,0,171330.story

Hated It

The New York Post

Score: 0/4
Don't let the stupid title dissuade you from seeing "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter." Let the stupid plot, the stupid history, the stupid action scenes, the stupid trivializing of slavery...

Read more:

The Wall Street Journal

Someone forgot to tell the filmmakers ... that the movie was supposed to be fun. Or at least smart.

Read more:

New York Daily News

Score: 20/100
This insipid mashup of history lesson and monster flick takes itself semi-seriously, which is truly deadly.

Read more:

Miami Herald

Score: 25/100
Enormous in its scope and colossal in its stupidity.

Read more:

Wikian Reviews

Now it's time for Wikians to review Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. If you've already seen it, post your thoughts in the comments or post your own blog! Let us know what you thought while experiencing the games on the big screen!

Is Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter worth the price of admission?

The poll was created at 21:44 on June 22, 2012, and so far 4 people voted.

TelevisionLogo TwitterIcon  FacebookIcon  YoutubeIcon